Needless to say, of a lot doubtful prices are misattributed so you can Epikouros

Needless to say, of a lot doubtful prices are misattributed so you can Epikouros

Epikouros from Samos

Epikouros regarding Samos (existed 341 – 270 BC), whose name’s tend to Latinized given that Epicurus, is actually an effective Hellenistic Greek philosopher and the eponymous creator of your Greek philosophical college or university out of Epicureanism. Brand new Epicureans considered that the brand new gods didn’t come with wedding anyway for the person facts and you will was known for the skepticism off claims regarding supernatural phenomena.

You’ve got most likely viewed this quote attributed to Epikouros. It is probably the most greatest phrasing of Issue of Evil ever made:

Something is definite and that’s you to Epikouros yes never demonstrated the newest Epicurean trilemma with this particular text

“Try the guy [i.e. God] happy to avoid worst, although not ready? after that is actually the guy impotent. Is he able, however happy? then try the guy malicious. Is he each other able and you will ready? whence upcoming is worst?”

The brand new trilemma was initially shown with this text by the Scottish Enlightenment philosopher David Hume (stayed 1711 – 1776) inside the guide Dialogues regarding the Absolute Faith, that has been completed in 1776 soon before Hume’s passing and you may wrote posthumously for the 1779. Precisely why that it phrasing of trilemma can be misattributed so you’re able to Epikouros is basically because Hume credited the new argument by itself so you can Epikouros and individuals appear to misinterpreted your, convinced he had been directly quoting Epikouros in the place of paraphrasing.

ABOVE: Portrait coated when you look at the 1754 by Allan Ramsay of Scottish Enlightenment philosopher David Hume, the true author of the fresh new variety of the brand new thus-entitled “Epicurean trilemma” which is commonly cited into misattribution so you can Epikouros

Hume situated their malfunction of one’s Issue of Evil on the a malfunction in the early Christian apologist Lactantius (existed c. 250 – c. 325 Ad) into the chapter 13, verses twenty using twenty-one of is own treatise De Ira Dei (“Towards Wrath out of Goodness“). Lactantius writes, as the translated by William Fletcher:

“However if it account is valid, that Stoics was basically within the zero manner able to see, you to definitely dispute including out of Epicurus is completed aside. God, he says, either would like to pull away evils, and is unable; otherwise They are able, that’s unwilling; otherwise He or she is neither ready neither in a position, otherwise He is one another ready and you will in a position. If the He is happy and that is incapable, He could be feeble, which is not in accordance with the character out of Goodness; in the event that They are ready and you will hesitant, He or she is jealous, which is just as in the variance having Goodness; if He or she is neither willing nor in a position, He could be one another envious and you may feeble, hence not Goodness; in the event the They are one another willing and you can in a position, hence alone is suitable in order to Jesus, to what origin then try evils? Or how come He perhaps not take them out? I understand a large number of brand new philosophers, whom safeguard providence, are widely used to be disrupted by this disagreement, and are also almost inspired against their tend to to help you recognize you to God requires no interest in things, which Epicurus specifically is aimed at.”

Zero dispute at all such as this you to happens in any kind of brand new extant blogs out-of Epikouros. This might not necessarily indicate some thing, while the majority of all things Epikouros published has been destroyed. We simply have around three out-of Epikouros’s letters (i.elizabeth. the fresh Letter so you can Menoikeus, the new Page in order to Pythokles, while the Letter to help you Herodotos) as well as 2 series from quotations of his today-destroyed works (i.e. the main Doctrines additionally the Vatican Sayings).

Epikouros you certainly will hence keeps hypothetically demonstrated a disagreement across the lines out-of exactly what Lactantius refers to in one of their really works which can be don’t extant, instance their treatise Into the Gods, that your 3rd-century Advertising Greek biographer Diogenes Laertios praises as one of Epikouros’s most useful works, or his treatise Toward Nature, that’s proven to has actually spanned thirty-eight quantities, however, which merely survives for the fragments. However, it does raise uncertainty one to Lactantius doesn’t state hence treatise Epicurus is meant to have said that it when you look at the.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *